Clinical value of combined hemodynamic and metabolic agents in the treatment of stable angina

I. Holban, T. Hénane
Correspondence: Dr Thierry Hénane, 192 avenue Charles De Gaulle, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France. Tel: +33 155726138, fax: +33 155726888, e-mail: thierry.henane@fr.netgrs.com

Abstract

Despite the growing use of angioplasty or bypass surgery, a large number of coronary patients continue to require medical treatment. Despite the absence of clear evidence-based benefits over monotherapy, a combination of hemodynamic drugs is a widely used approach for the relief of angina symptoms. A new class of antianginal agents that optimize cardiac metabolism is now available. Trimetazidine, the first 3-ketoacyl-CoA-thiolase inhibitor, reduces fatty acid oxidation and stimulates glucose oxidation, and thus energy production. This metabolic intervention provides first-line antianginal efficacy as well as in combination with hemodynamic agents that fail to control signs of ischemia. The tolerance profile of trimetazidine is also excellent as the hemodynamic variables remain unchanged. n Heart Metab. 2002;18:36–38.

Keywords: Stable angina, combination therapy, trimetazidine

Introduction
According to European guidelines, the treatment of stable angina should aim both to improve the prognosis and to eliminate or reduce symptoms [1]. Symptom relief can be achieved through medical therapy or a revascularization procedure. Despite the growing success of the latter, medical therapy remains a mainstay in the management of stable angina. Moreover, an emerging therapeutic problem is represented by recurrent angina following successful angioplasty or surgery. For these reasons, pharmacological agents are widely used, in particular conventional hemodynamic drugs (nitrates, b-blockers, calcium antagonists) which target myocardial oxygen demand. These drugs are often given in combination even if, as stated by Thadani [2], “combination therapy with two or three agents is not always superior to optimal therapy.” This was also summarized in an editorial by Jackson [3]: “Maximal therapy is not the same as optimal therapy.” Indeed, the efficacy of hemodynamic combination remains controversial following the publication of several international studies which suggest that combined hemodynamic treatment is not likely to prove more effective than monotherapy, while often leading to an alteration of the tolerance profile (Table I). Thus, the IMAGE, TIBET, and, more recently, Ferguson study have raised doubts about the clinical value of a combined therapeutic approach [4–6].

Table I: comparative studies of combined hemodynamic therapy over monotherapy.

Rationale for the use of metabolic agents
Myocardial ischemia is accompanied by cardiac metabolic changes which in turn cause a decrease in energy production and an alteration of cardiac contractility. There is experimental and clinical evidence that these consequences of ischemia can be overcome through manipulation of cardiac metabolism [7]. This has led to the development of a promising pharmacologic intervention with a new class of metabolic agents known as 3-ketoacyl-CoA-thiolase (3-KAT) inhibitors. Trimetazidine (Vastarel 20 mg) is the first 3-KAT inhibitor available for clinical use worldwide.

Trimetazidine: evidence-based efficacy
The antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of trimetazidine are due to its metabolic mechanism of action. Trimetazidine partially reduces fatty acid b-oxidation secondary to the selective inhibition of a mitochondrial enzyme: 3-ketoacyl-CoA-thiolase [8]. This results in a shift of cardiac metabolism from fatty acids to glucose oxidation, which in turn restores ATP production and protects the heart from ischemia-related damage. The antianginal efficacy of trimetazidine was proven in monotherapy in comparison with reference drugs and in addition to hemodynamic agents in patients with a positive exercise test and angina symptoms despite monotherapy with a b-blocker or a calcium antagonist [9–11]. This was also shown in a study by Michaelides et al [12], where stable angina patients resistant to propranolol received either trimetazidine 20 mg tid or a nitrate (isosorbide dinitrate 10 mg tid) for 2 months.

Figure 1: Significant improvement in exercise test results with trimetazidine.

Based on results that showed an improvement in ergometric parameters and clinical signs (Figures 1 and 2), the authors concluded that “in patients with angina not sufficiently controlled with propranolol, a better antianginal efficacy was observed with the addition of trimetazidine than with the addition of isosorbide dinitrate.” This can easily be explained by the purely metabolic mechanism of action of trimetazidine, which is fully additive to that of the hemodynamic agent.
The additive benefits of trimetazidine with a hemodynamic agent were also demonstrated in a specific population of at-risk patients: 120 elderly coronary patients (mean age 70 ± 4 years), who were insufficiently controlled with their standard treatment, received trimetazidine 20 mg tid in this 3-month, open-label multicenter study (TIGER study) #13. Between week 0 and week 12, exercise duration increased by 52 seconds (P <0.001) and the mean number of angina attacks per week decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (P <0.001) (Figure 3). More importantly, the quality of life as assessed by patients was rated as excellent or good in 89% of cases. As a result of its pure metabolic mechanism of action, trimetazidine did not change the rate-pressure product and ensured excellent acceptability.

Figure 2: Trimetazidine significantly reduces the mean number of angina attacks per week.


The TIGER study provides additional evidence of the clinical value of trimetazidine in elderly coronary patients who are resistant to a hemodynamic therapy. Cardioprotection through a metabolic therapy offers a new treatment option for these fragile patients in whom revascularization procedures might not be appropriate due to their higher risk of morbidity. Moreover, the absence of clinically significant reported drug interaction with trimetazidine is of particular value in a population which is likely to receive multiple drug treatment.

Figure 3: Reduction in the mean number of angina attacks per week with trimetazidine (TIGER study).

 

 

 





 

REFERENCES
 

1: Eur Heart J. 1997 Mar;18(3):394-413. Related Articles, Links

Management of stable angina pectoris. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology.

[No authors listed]

Publication Types:
  • Guideline
  • Practice Guideline
  • Review
  • Review, Tutorial


PMID: 9076376 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
2: Am J Cardiol. 1997 Jun 26;79(12B):24-30. Related Articles, Links

Management of patients with chronic stable angina at low risk for serious cardiac events.

Thadani U.

Cardiovascular Department, University of Oklahoma-HSC, Oklahoma City 73104, USA.

Successful management of the patient with chronic stable angina requires correct stratification by assessing the risk of future coronary events. Patients at low risk for such events have a relatively good prognosis; revascularization procedures (balloon angioplasty or surgery) offer no benefit over medical management. Such patients should be offered medical therapy as their first option. The goals in management of chronic stable angina are (1) treatment of other conditions that may worsen angina; (2) treatment with aspirin and modification of risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) to improve outcome; and (3) effective relief of anginal symptoms. Most patients with stable angina will have CAD. It is well established that treatment with aspirin and modification of risk factors for CAD are beneficial in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Blood pressure reduction, lowering of blood cholesterol level, and smoking cessation are interventions of proven value and appear to correct defects (at least partially) in the endothelial function of the coronary blood vessels. Other interventions that are helpful are estrogen replacement treatment in postmenopausal women, and low-dose aspirin therapy-which is recommended for all patients who can tolerate it. For controlling symptoms and improving angina-free walking time, nitrates, beta blockers, and calcium channel antagonists are efficacious as first-line monotherapy for chronic stable angina in this group of patients. Nitrates may be of special use in patients with impaired left ventricular function, overt congestive heart failure, intermittent coronary vasoconstriction, or coronary artery spasm. In patients with concomitant hypertension or supraventricular tachycardia, beta blockers are helpful. Calcium channel antagonists may be useful in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, or hypertension. When optimal monotherapy with a given class of drug fails to control symptoms, alternative monotherapy with a different class of agent should be tried before combination therapy. Combination therapy with 2 or 3 agents is not always superior to optimal monotherapy. Patients who fail to respond to adequate medical therapy should be considered for a revascularization procedure.

Publication Types:
  • Review
  • Review Literature


PMID: 9223354 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
3: Int J Clin Pract. 2000 Jul-Aug;54(6):351. Related Articles, Links

Comment on:


Stable angina: maximal medical therapy is not the same as optimal medical therapy.

Jackson G.

Publication Types:

  • Comment
  • Editorial


PMID: 11092105 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


  4. Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Egstrup K, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:311–316.
 

5: Eur Heart J. 1996 Jan;17(1):96-103. Related Articles, Links

The Total Ischaemic Burden European Trial (TIBET). Effects of atenolol, nifedipine SR and their combination on the exercise test and the total ischaemic burden in 608 patients with stable angina. The TIBET Study Group.

Fox KM, Mulcahy D, Findlay I, Ford I, Dargie HJ.

Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of atenolol, nifedipine and their combination on exercise parameters and ambulatory ischaemic activity in patients with mild chronic stable angina. SETTING: Multicentre, multinational study involving 608 patients from 69 centres in nine countries. DESIGN: Placebo washout followed by double-blind parallel-group study comparing atenolol 50 mg bd, nifedipine SR 20 mg bd, and their combination. Patients underwent maximal exercise testing using either a bicycle (n = 289) or treadmill (n = 319) and 48 h of ambulatory ST segment monitoring outside the hospital environment at the end of the placebo washout period and after 6 weeks of active therapy. RESULTS: Both medications alone and in combination caused significant improvements in exercise parameters and significant reductions in ischaemic activity during daily activities, when compared with placebo. There were, however, no significant differences between groups, for any of the measured ischaemic parameters although combination therapy resulted in a greater fall in resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure than either treatment alone. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of mild chronic stable angina there appears to be little advantage gained from using combination therapy for ischaemia reduction.

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial


PMID: 8682138 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
6: Int J Clin Pract. 2000 Jul-Aug;54(6):360-3. Related Articles, Links

Comment in:


Bisoprolol alone and in combination with amlodipine or nifedipine in the treatment of chronic stable angina.

Ferguson JD, Ormerod O, Lenox-Smith AJ.

Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Beta-blockers and calcium antagonists are both effective monotherapy for stable angina. When symptoms persist, these two agents are commonly co-prescribed in the hope that this combination has added benefit compared with monotherapy alone. We investigated the additional efficacy of the calcium antagonists amlodipine and nifedipine when added to bisoprolol in patients with stable angina. Patients were randomised in a multicentre, single-blind study, with crossover of three treatments consisting of bisoprolol 10 mg once daily, bisoprolol plus nifedipine 20 mg twice daily, and bisoprolol plus amlodipine 5 mg once daily. Exercise tests were performed at the end of each four-week study period and the exercise time to onset of angina was assessed. A total of 198 patients from 17 centres were recruited of whom 147 were evaluable for efficacy. There were no statistically significant differences in exercise duration to onset of angina between any of the groups. The combination of bisoprolol plus nifedipine was least well tolerated. In summary, this study suggests there is little benefit in adding a calcium antagonist to bisoprolol in treating patients with stable angina.

Publication Types:

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial


PMID: 11092108 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
7: Coron Artery Dis. 2001 Feb;12 Suppl 1:S8-11. Related Articles, Links
Click here to read 
Optimizing cardiac energy metabolism: how can fatty acid and carbohydrate metabolism be manipulated?

Lopaschuk GD.

Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, Canada. gary.lopaschuk@ualberta

Optimizing energy metabolism in the heart is a novel approach for the management of ischaemic heart disease, especially in conjunction with optimizing or restoring coronary flow. In particular, promoting myocardial glucose metabolism can enhance heart function, lessen injury to tissue, or both. Several pharmacological agents that directly stimulate myocardial glucose oxidation or indirectly stimulate glucose oxidation secondary to inhibition of oxidation of fatty acids are now available. Trimetazidine is the first compound in the class of 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme A thiolase inhibitors to see wide-spread clinical use. This agent increases glucose metabolism in the heart secondary to a direct inhibition of fatty acid metabolism. Considering results of experimental and clinical studies on other agents, it is clear that metabolic agents may provide a new approach to treating cardiovascular disease that should complement and improve existing therapies.

Publication Types:
  • Review
  • Review, Tutorial


PMID: 11286307 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
8: Circ Res. 2000 Mar 17;86(5):580-8. Related Articles, Links

Comment in:

Click here to read 
The antianginal drug trimetazidine shifts cardiac energy metabolism from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation by inhibiting mitochondrial long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase.

Kantor PF, Lucien A, Kozak R, Lopaschuk GD.

Cardiovascular Research Group and the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Trimetazidine is a clinically effective antianginal agent that has no negative inotropic or vasodilator properties. Although it is thought to have direct cytoprotective actions on the myocardium, the mechanism(s) by which this occurs is as yet undefined. In this study, we determined what effects trimetazidine has on both fatty acid and glucose metabolism in isolated working rat hearts and on the activities of various enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation. Hearts were perfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 100 microU/mL insulin, 3% albumin, 5 mmol/L glucose, and fatty acids of different chain lengths. Both glucose and fatty acids were appropriately radiolabeled with either (3)H or (14)C for measurement of glycolysis, glucose oxidation, and fatty acid oxidation. Trimetazidine had no effect on myocardial oxygen consumption or cardiac work under any aerobic perfusion condition used. In hearts perfused with 5 mmol/L glucose and 0.4 mmol/L palmitate, trimetazidine decreased the rate of palmitate oxidation from 488+/-24 to 408+/-15 nmol x g dry weight(-1) x minute(-1) (P<0.05), whereas it increased rates of glucose oxidation from 1889+/-119 to 2378+/-166 nmol x g dry weight(-1) x minute(-1) (P<0.05). In hearts subjected to low-flow ischemia, trimetazidine resulted in a 210% increase in glucose oxidation rates. In both aerobic and ischemic hearts, glycolytic rates were unaltered by trimetazidine. The effects of trimetazidine on glucose oxidation were accompanied by a 37% increase in the active form of pyruvate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme for glucose oxidation. No effect of trimetazidine was observed on glycolysis, glucose oxidation, fatty acid oxidation, or active pyruvate dehydrogenase when palmitate was substituted with 0.8 mmol/L octanoate or 1.6 mmol/L butyrate, suggesting that trimetazidine directly inhibits long-chain fatty acid oxidation. This reduction in fatty acid oxidation was accompanied by a significant decrease in the activity of the long-chain isoform of the last enzyme involved in fatty acid beta-oxidation, 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A (CoA) thiolase activity (IC(50) of 75 nmol/L). In contrast, concentrations of trimetazidine in excess of 10 and 100 micromol/L were needed to inhibit the medium- and short-chain forms of 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase, respectively. Previous studies have shown that inhibition of fatty acid oxidation and stimulation of glucose oxidation can protect the ischemic heart. Therefore, our data suggest that the antianginal effects of trimetazidine may occur because of an inhibition of long-chain 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase activity, which results in a reduction in fatty acid oxidation and a stimulation of glucose oxidation.

PMID: 10720420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
9: Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Mar;37(3):279-88. Related Articles, Links

Trimetazidine: a new concept in the treatment of angina. Comparison with propranolol in patients with stable angina. Trimetazidine European Multicenter Study Group.

Detry JM, Sellier P, Pennaforte S, Cokkinos D, Dargie H, Mathes P.

Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

1. Trimetazidine has a direct anti-ischaemic effect on the myocardium without altering the rate x pressure product or coronary blood flow. 2. The effects of trimetazidine (20 mg three times daily) were compared with those of propranolol (40 mg three times daily) in a double-blind parallel group multicentre study in 149 men with stable angina. 3. Reproducibility of exercise performance was verified during a 3 week run-in placebo washout period. All patients had > 1 mm ST-depression on exercise test. 4. After 3 months, similar anti-anginal efficacy was observed between the trimetazidine (n = 71) and propranolol (n = 78) groups. No significant differences were observed between trimetazidine and propranolol as regards anginal attack rate per week (mean difference P-TMZ: 2; 95% CI: -4.4, 0.5) and exercise duration (mean difference P-TMZ: 0 s; 95% CI: -33, 34) or time to 1 mm ST segment depression (mean difference P-TMZ: 13 s; 95% CI: -24, 51). Heart rate and rate x pressure product at rest and at peak exercise remained unchanged in the trimetazidine group but significantly decreased with propranolol (P < 0.001 in all cases). With both drugs there was a trend to decreased ischaemic episodes in the 46% patients who experienced ambulatory ischaemia on Holter monitoring. Six patients stopped trimetazidine and 12 propranolol. Of these, five in each group were withdrawn because of deterioration in cardiovascular status. 5. The results suggest that trimetazidine and propranolol at the doses studied have similar efficacy in patients with stable angina pectoris.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial


PMID: 8198938 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
10: Am J Cardiol. 1995 Aug 24;76(6):12B-16B. Related Articles, Links

Combination therapy of trimetazidine with diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease. Group of South of France Investigators.

Levy S.

Division of Cardiology, Hopital Nord, University of Marseille School of Medicine, France.

The efficacy of trimetazidine, an antianginal agent with a direct effect on ischemic myocardium, has been tested alone or in combination with beta blockers or nifedipine. The combination with diltiazem, a widely used calcium antagonist, has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of oral trimetazidine (20 mg 3 times daily) in combination with oral diltiazem (60 mg three times daily). This was a multicenter, placebo-controlled study with a follow-up period of 6 months. Patients with stable angina and a positive exercise electrocardiogram before and after 15 days of diltiazem therapy were included. The 67 patients were randomized to diltiazem plus placebo (group I, 35 patients) and diltiazem plus trimetazidine (group II, 32 patients). Follow-up included a bicycle ergometer maximal exercise test and a physical examination at inclusion and at 3 and 6 months. The 2 groups were similar in terms of ergometric parameters, except for the ischemic threshold, defined as the time to 1-mm ST-segment depression. The latter was shorter in group II. Comparison of exercise tests performed at inclusion and after 6 months of therapy in both groups showed that the ischemic threshold was significantly prolonged (2 minutes 41 seconds; p < 0.001) in group II. This was not the case for group I, which showed a 41-second prolongation only (difference not significant). The work (kPM) produced at 1-mm ST-segment depression was also significantly increased in group II (1,445.9 kPM; p < 0.001) compared with group I (563.7 kPM; p = 0.012).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial


PMID: 7645522 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
11: Heart. 1997 Oct;78(4):353-7. Related Articles, Links
Click here to read 
Combination treatment with trimetazidine and diltiazem in stable angina pectoris.

Manchanda SC, Krishnaswami S.

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

OBJECTIVE: To assess antianginal efficacy and possible adverse haemodynamic effects of combination treatment with trimetazidine and diltiazem in patients with stable angina. DESIGN: Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial of four weeks duration. SETTING: Outpatient department of two Indian hospitals. SUBJECTS: 64 male patients with stable angina, uncontrolled on diltiazem alone. INTERVENTIONS: Diltiazem 180 mg and trimetazidine 60 mg, or diltiazem 180 mg and placebo daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in exercise time to 1 mm ST segment depression. RESULTS: 33 patients (55%) had no exercise induced angina at 3 mm ST segment depression at inclusion in the study (silent ischaemia). Intention to treat analysis showed that of 32 patients in each treatment group, the number (%) of patients responding to trimetazidine compared to placebo was: for anginal attacks, 28 (87.5) v 15 (46.9), p < 0.001; for exercise time to 1 mm ST segment depression, 21 (65.6) v 9 (28.1), p < 0.003; for exercise time to angina, 12 (37.5) v 5 (15.6), p < 0.05; and for maximum work at peak exercise, 17 (53.1) v 8 (25), p < 0.02. Compared to placebo, there was net improvement with trimetazidine in mean anginal attacks of 4.8/ week (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5 to 2.1; p < 0.002); in mean exercise times at 1 mm ST segment depression of 94.2 seconds (95% CI 182.8 to 5.6; p < 0.05), and at onset of angina of 113.1 seconds (95% CI 181.6 to 44.6; p < 0.02); and in mean maximum work at peak exercise of 1.4 metabolic equivalents (95% CI 2.4 to 0.3; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stable angina uncontrolled with diltiazem had a clinically important improvement after combination treatment with trimetazidine, without adverse haemodynamic events or increased side effects.

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial


PMID: 9404250 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

12. Michaelides AP, Spiropoulos K, Dimopoulos K, Athanasiades D, Toutouzas P. Clin Drug Invest. 1997;13:8–14.
13. Kolbel F, Bada V. Heart. 2002;87(suppl 1):A9–A10.


Although great care has been taken in compiling the information given in this website,
the publisher or the sponsor is not responsible for the continued currency of the information,
for any errors or omissions, or for any consequence arising therefrom.
© 2010 Les Laboratoires Servier