Clinical value of combined
hemodynamic and metabolic agents in the treatment of stable angina
I. Holban, T. Hénane
Correspondence: Dr Thierry Hénane, 192 avenue Charles De
Gaulle, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France.
Tel: +33 155726138, fax: +33 155726888, e-mail: thierry.henane@fr.netgrs.com
| Abstract
Despite the growing use of angioplasty or bypass surgery,
a large number of coronary patients continue to require
medical treatment. Despite the absence of clear evidence-based
benefits over monotherapy, a combination of hemodynamic
drugs is a widely used approach for the relief of angina
symptoms. A new class of antianginal agents that optimize
cardiac metabolism is now available. Trimetazidine, the
first 3-ketoacyl-CoA-thiolase inhibitor, reduces fatty
acid oxidation and stimulates glucose oxidation, and thus
energy production. This metabolic intervention provides
first-line antianginal efficacy as well as in combination
with hemodynamic agents that fail to control signs of ischemia.
The tolerance profile of trimetazidine is also excellent
as the hemodynamic variables remain unchanged. n Heart
Metab. 2002;18:36–38.
Keywords: Stable
angina, combination therapy, trimetazidine |
Introduction
According to European guidelines, the treatment of stable angina
should aim both to improve the prognosis and to eliminate or reduce
symptoms [1]. Symptom relief can be achieved through medical therapy
or a revascularization procedure. Despite the growing success of
the latter, medical therapy remains a mainstay in the management
of stable angina. Moreover, an emerging therapeutic problem is
represented by recurrent angina following successful angioplasty
or surgery. For these reasons, pharmacological agents are widely
used, in particular conventional hemodynamic drugs (nitrates, b-blockers,
calcium antagonists) which target myocardial oxygen demand. These
drugs are often given in combination even if, as stated by Thadani [2], “combination therapy with two or three agents is not always
superior to optimal therapy.” This was also summarized in an editorial
by Jackson [3]: “Maximal therapy is not the same as optimal therapy.”
Indeed, the efficacy of hemodynamic combination remains controversial
following the publication of
several international studies which suggest that combined hemodynamic
treatment is not likely to prove more effective than monotherapy,
while often leading to an alteration of the tolerance profile (Table
I). Thus, the IMAGE, TIBET, and, more recently, Ferguson study
have raised doubts about the clinical value of a combined therapeutic
approach [4–6].
Table I: comparative studies of combined hemodynamic
therapy over monotherapy.
Rationale for the use of metabolic agents
Myocardial ischemia is accompanied by cardiac metabolic changes
which in turn cause a decrease in energy production and an alteration
of cardiac contractility. There is experimental and clinical evidence
that these consequences of ischemia can be overcome through manipulation
of cardiac metabolism [7]. This has led to the development of a
promising pharmacologic intervention with a new class of metabolic
agents known as 3-ketoacyl-CoA-thiolase (3-KAT) inhibitors. Trimetazidine
(Vastarel 20 mg) is the first 3-KAT inhibitor available for clinical
use worldwide.
Trimetazidine: evidence-based efficacy
The antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of trimetazidine are
due to its metabolic mechanism of action. Trimetazidine partially
reduces fatty acid b-oxidation secondary to the selective inhibition
of a mitochondrial enzyme: 3-ketoacyl-CoA-thiolase [8]. This results
in a shift of cardiac metabolism from fatty acids to glucose oxidation,
which in turn restores ATP production and protects the heart from
ischemia-related damage. The antianginal efficacy of trimetazidine
was proven in monotherapy in comparison with reference drugs and
in addition to hemodynamic agents in patients with a positive exercise
test and angina symptoms despite monotherapy with a b-blocker or
a calcium antagonist [9–11]. This was also shown in a study by
Michaelides et al [12], where stable angina patients resistant
to propranolol received either trimetazidine 20 mg tid or a nitrate
(isosorbide dinitrate 10 mg tid) for 2 months.
Figure
1: Significant improvement in exercise test results with trimetazidine.
Based on results
that showed an improvement in ergometric parameters and
clinical signs (Figures 1 and 2), the authors concluded that
“in patients with angina not sufficiently controlled with propranolol,
a better antianginal efficacy was observed with the addition
of
trimetazidine than with the addition of isosorbide dinitrate.”
This can easily be explained by the purely metabolic mechanism
of action of trimetazidine, which is fully additive to that of
the hemodynamic agent.
The additive benefits of trimetazidine with a hemodynamic agent
were also demonstrated in a specific population of at-risk patients:
120 elderly coronary patients
(mean age 70 ± 4 years), who were insufficiently controlled with their
standard treatment, received trimetazidine 20 mg tid in this 3-month, open-label
multicenter study (TIGER study) #13. Between week 0 and week 12, exercise
duration increased by 52 seconds (P <0.001) and the mean number of angina
attacks per week decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (P <0.001) (Figure 3). More
importantly, the quality of life as assessed by patients was rated as excellent
or good
in 89% of cases. As a result of its pure metabolic mechanism of action, trimetazidine
did not change the rate-pressure product and ensured excellent acceptability.
Figure
2: Trimetazidine significantly reduces the mean number of angina
attacks per week.
The TIGER study provides additional evidence of the clinical
value of trimetazidine in elderly coronary patients who are
resistant to a hemodynamic therapy.
Cardioprotection through a metabolic therapy offers a new treatment option
for these fragile
patients in whom revascularization procedures might not be appropriate
due to their higher risk of morbidity. Moreover, the absence
of clinically significant
reported drug interaction with trimetazidine is of particular value in
a population which is likely to receive multiple drug treatment.
Figure
3: Reduction in the mean number of angina attacks per week with
trimetazidine (TIGER study).
REFERENCES
Management of stable angina pectoris.
Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of
Cardiology.
[No authors listed]
Publication Types:
- Guideline
- Practice Guideline
- Review
- Review, Tutorial
PMID: 9076376 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Management of patients with chronic stable angina
at low risk for serious cardiac events.
Thadani U.
Cardiovascular Department, University of Oklahoma-HSC, Oklahoma City
73104, USA.
Successful management of the patient with chronic stable angina
requires correct stratification by assessing the risk of future
coronary events. Patients at low risk for such events have a
relatively good prognosis; revascularization procedures (balloon
angioplasty or surgery) offer no benefit over medical management.
Such patients should be offered medical therapy as their first
option. The goals in management of chronic stable angina are (1)
treatment of other conditions that may worsen angina; (2) treatment
with aspirin and modification of risk factors for coronary artery
disease (CAD) to improve outcome; and (3) effective relief of
anginal symptoms. Most patients with stable angina will have CAD. It
is well established that treatment with aspirin and modification of
risk factors for CAD are beneficial in reducing cardiovascular
mortality and morbidity. Blood pressure reduction, lowering of blood
cholesterol level, and smoking cessation are interventions of proven
value and appear to correct defects (at least partially) in the
endothelial function of the coronary blood vessels. Other
interventions that are helpful are estrogen replacement treatment in
postmenopausal women, and low-dose aspirin therapy-which is
recommended for all patients who can tolerate it. For controlling
symptoms and improving angina-free walking time, nitrates, beta
blockers, and calcium channel antagonists are efficacious as
first-line monotherapy for chronic stable angina in this group of
patients. Nitrates may be of special use in patients with impaired
left ventricular function, overt congestive heart failure,
intermittent coronary vasoconstriction, or coronary artery spasm. In
patients with concomitant hypertension or supraventricular
tachycardia, beta blockers are helpful. Calcium channel antagonists
may be useful in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease, peripheral vascular disease, or hypertension. When optimal
monotherapy with a given class of drug fails to control symptoms,
alternative monotherapy with a different class of agent should be
tried before combination therapy. Combination therapy with 2 or 3
agents is not always superior to optimal monotherapy. Patients who
fail to respond to adequate medical therapy should be considered for
a revascularization procedure.
Publication Types:
PMID: 9223354 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Comment on:
Stable angina: maximal medical therapy is not the
same as optimal medical therapy.
Jackson G.
Publication Types:
PMID: 11092105 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4. Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Egstrup K, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1996;27:311–316.
The Total Ischaemic Burden European Trial
(TIBET). Effects of atenolol, nifedipine SR and their combination on
the exercise test and the total ischaemic burden in 608 patients
with stable angina. The TIBET Study Group.
Fox KM, Mulcahy D, Findlay I, Ford I, Dargie HJ.
Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of atenolol, nifedipine and
their combination on exercise parameters and ambulatory ischaemic
activity in patients with mild chronic stable angina. SETTING:
Multicentre, multinational study involving 608 patients from 69
centres in nine countries. DESIGN: Placebo washout followed by
double-blind parallel-group study comparing atenolol 50 mg bd,
nifedipine SR 20 mg bd, and their combination. Patients underwent
maximal exercise testing using either a bicycle (n = 289) or
treadmill (n = 319) and 48 h of ambulatory ST segment monitoring
outside the hospital environment at the end of the placebo washout
period and after 6 weeks of active therapy. RESULTS: Both
medications alone and in combination caused significant improvements
in exercise parameters and significant reductions in ischaemic
activity during daily activities, when compared with placebo. There
were, however, no significant differences between groups, for any of
the measured ischaemic parameters although combination therapy
resulted in a greater fall in resting systolic and diastolic blood
pressure than either treatment alone. CONCLUSIONS: In the management
of mild chronic stable angina there appears to be little advantage
gained from using combination therapy for ischaemia reduction.
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Multicenter Study
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 8682138 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Comment in:
Bisoprolol alone and in combination with
amlodipine or nifedipine in the treatment of chronic stable angina.
Ferguson JD, Ormerod O, Lenox-Smith AJ.
Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Beta-blockers and calcium antagonists are both effective monotherapy
for stable angina. When symptoms persist, these two agents are
commonly co-prescribed in the hope that this combination has added
benefit compared with monotherapy alone. We investigated the
additional efficacy of the calcium antagonists amlodipine and
nifedipine when added to bisoprolol in patients with stable angina.
Patients were randomised in a multicentre, single-blind study, with
crossover of three treatments consisting of bisoprolol 10 mg once
daily, bisoprolol plus nifedipine 20 mg twice daily, and bisoprolol
plus amlodipine 5 mg once daily. Exercise tests were performed at
the end of each four-week study period and the exercise time to
onset of angina was assessed. A total of 198 patients from 17
centres were recruited of whom 147 were evaluable for efficacy.
There were no statistically significant differences in exercise
duration to onset of angina between any of the groups. The
combination of bisoprolol plus nifedipine was least well tolerated.
In summary, this study suggests there is little benefit in adding a
calcium antagonist to bisoprolol in treating patients with stable
angina.
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Multicenter Study
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 11092108 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Optimizing cardiac energy metabolism: how can
fatty acid and carbohydrate metabolism be manipulated?
Lopaschuk GD.
Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Alberta, Faculty of
Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, Canada. gary.lopaschuk@ualberta
Optimizing energy metabolism in the heart is a novel approach for
the management of ischaemic heart disease, especially in conjunction
with optimizing or restoring coronary flow. In particular, promoting
myocardial glucose metabolism can enhance heart function, lessen
injury to tissue, or both. Several pharmacological agents that
directly stimulate myocardial glucose oxidation or indirectly
stimulate glucose oxidation secondary to inhibition of oxidation of
fatty acids are now available. Trimetazidine is the first compound
in the class of 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme A thiolase inhibitors to see
wide-spread clinical use. This agent increases glucose metabolism in
the heart secondary to a direct inhibition of fatty acid metabolism.
Considering results of experimental and clinical studies on other
agents, it is clear that metabolic agents may provide a new approach
to treating cardiovascular disease that should complement and
improve existing therapies.
Publication Types:
PMID: 11286307 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Comment in:
The antianginal drug trimetazidine shifts cardiac
energy metabolism from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation by
inhibiting mitochondrial long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase.
Kantor PF, Lucien A, Kozak R, Lopaschuk GD.
Cardiovascular Research Group and the Division of Pediatric
Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Trimetazidine is a clinically effective antianginal agent that has
no negative inotropic or vasodilator properties. Although it is
thought to have direct cytoprotective actions on the myocardium, the
mechanism(s) by which this occurs is as yet undefined. In this
study, we determined what effects trimetazidine has on both fatty
acid and glucose metabolism in isolated working rat hearts and on
the activities of various enzymes involved in fatty acid oxidation.
Hearts were perfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 100
microU/mL insulin, 3% albumin, 5 mmol/L glucose, and fatty acids of
different chain lengths. Both glucose and fatty acids were
appropriately radiolabeled with either (3)H or (14)C for measurement
of glycolysis, glucose oxidation, and fatty acid oxidation.
Trimetazidine had no effect on myocardial oxygen consumption or
cardiac work under any aerobic perfusion condition used. In hearts
perfused with 5 mmol/L glucose and 0.4 mmol/L palmitate,
trimetazidine decreased the rate of palmitate oxidation from
488+/-24 to 408+/-15 nmol x g dry weight(-1) x minute(-1) (P<0.05),
whereas it increased rates of glucose oxidation from 1889+/-119 to
2378+/-166 nmol x g dry weight(-1) x minute(-1) (P<0.05). In hearts
subjected to low-flow ischemia, trimetazidine resulted in a 210%
increase in glucose oxidation rates. In both aerobic and ischemic
hearts, glycolytic rates were unaltered by trimetazidine. The
effects of trimetazidine on glucose oxidation were accompanied by a
37% increase in the active form of pyruvate dehydrogenase, the
rate-limiting enzyme for glucose oxidation. No effect of
trimetazidine was observed on glycolysis, glucose oxidation, fatty
acid oxidation, or active pyruvate dehydrogenase when palmitate was
substituted with 0.8 mmol/L octanoate or 1.6 mmol/L butyrate,
suggesting that trimetazidine directly inhibits long-chain fatty
acid oxidation. This reduction in fatty acid oxidation was
accompanied by a significant decrease in the activity of the
long-chain isoform of the last enzyme involved in fatty acid
beta-oxidation, 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A (CoA) thiolase activity
(IC(50) of 75 nmol/L). In contrast, concentrations of trimetazidine
in excess of 10 and 100 micromol/L were needed to inhibit the
medium- and short-chain forms of 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase,
respectively. Previous studies have shown that inhibition of fatty
acid oxidation and stimulation of glucose oxidation can protect the
ischemic heart. Therefore, our data suggest that the antianginal
effects of trimetazidine may occur because of an inhibition of
long-chain 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase activity, which results in a
reduction in fatty acid oxidation and a stimulation of glucose
oxidation.
PMID: 10720420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Trimetazidine: a new concept in the treatment of
angina. Comparison with propranolol in patients with stable angina.
Trimetazidine European Multicenter Study Group.
Detry JM, Sellier P, Pennaforte S, Cokkinos D, Dargie H, Mathes
P.
Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
1. Trimetazidine has a direct anti-ischaemic effect on the
myocardium without altering the rate x pressure product or coronary
blood flow. 2. The effects of trimetazidine (20 mg three times
daily) were compared with those of propranolol (40 mg three times
daily) in a double-blind parallel group multicentre study in 149 men
with stable angina. 3. Reproducibility of exercise performance was
verified during a 3 week run-in placebo washout period. All patients
had > 1 mm ST-depression on exercise test. 4. After 3 months,
similar anti-anginal efficacy was observed between the trimetazidine
(n = 71) and propranolol (n = 78) groups. No significant differences
were observed between trimetazidine and propranolol as regards
anginal attack rate per week (mean difference P-TMZ: 2; 95% CI:
-4.4, 0.5) and exercise duration (mean difference P-TMZ: 0 s; 95%
CI: -33, 34) or time to 1 mm ST segment depression (mean difference
P-TMZ: 13 s; 95% CI: -24, 51). Heart rate and rate x pressure
product at rest and at peak exercise remained unchanged in the
trimetazidine group but significantly decreased with propranolol (P
< 0.001 in all cases). With both drugs there was a trend to
decreased ischaemic episodes in the 46% patients who experienced
ambulatory ischaemia on Holter monitoring. Six patients stopped
trimetazidine and 12 propranolol. Of these, five in each group were
withdrawn because of deterioration in cardiovascular status. 5. The
results suggest that trimetazidine and propranolol at the doses
studied have similar efficacy in patients with stable angina
pectoris.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Multicenter Study
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 8198938 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Combination therapy of trimetazidine with
diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease. Group of South
of France Investigators.
Levy S.
Division of Cardiology, Hopital Nord, University of Marseille School
of Medicine, France.
The efficacy of trimetazidine, an antianginal agent with a direct
effect on ischemic myocardium, has been tested alone or in
combination with beta blockers or nifedipine. The combination with
diltiazem, a widely used calcium antagonist, has not been studied.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of oral
trimetazidine (20 mg 3 times daily) in combination with oral
diltiazem (60 mg three times daily). This was a multicenter,
placebo-controlled study with a follow-up period of 6 months.
Patients with stable angina and a positive exercise
electrocardiogram before and after 15 days of diltiazem therapy were
included. The 67 patients were randomized to diltiazem plus placebo
(group I, 35 patients) and diltiazem plus trimetazidine (group II,
32 patients). Follow-up included a bicycle ergometer maximal
exercise test and a physical examination at inclusion and at 3 and 6
months. The 2 groups were similar in terms of ergometric parameters,
except for the ischemic threshold, defined as the time to 1-mm
ST-segment depression. The latter was shorter in group II.
Comparison of exercise tests performed at inclusion and after 6
months of therapy in both groups showed that the ischemic threshold
was significantly prolonged (2 minutes 41 seconds; p < 0.001) in
group II. This was not the case for group I, which showed a
41-second prolongation only (difference not significant). The work
(kPM) produced at 1-mm ST-segment depression was also significantly
increased in group II (1,445.9 kPM; p < 0.001) compared with group I
(563.7 kPM; p = 0.012).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Multicenter Study
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 7645522 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Combination treatment with trimetazidine and
diltiazem in stable angina pectoris.
Manchanda SC, Krishnaswami S.
Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi, India.
OBJECTIVE: To assess antianginal efficacy and possible adverse
haemodynamic effects of combination treatment with trimetazidine and
diltiazem in patients with stable angina. DESIGN: Double blind,
randomised, placebo controlled trial of four weeks duration.
SETTING: Outpatient department of two Indian hospitals. SUBJECTS: 64
male patients with stable angina, uncontrolled on diltiazem alone.
INTERVENTIONS: Diltiazem 180 mg and trimetazidine 60 mg, or
diltiazem 180 mg and placebo daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in
exercise time to 1 mm ST segment depression. RESULTS: 33 patients
(55%) had no exercise induced angina at 3 mm ST segment depression
at inclusion in the study (silent ischaemia). Intention to treat
analysis showed that of 32 patients in each treatment group, the
number (%) of patients responding to trimetazidine compared to
placebo was: for anginal attacks, 28 (87.5) v 15 (46.9), p < 0.001;
for exercise time to 1 mm ST segment depression, 21 (65.6) v 9
(28.1), p < 0.003; for exercise time to angina, 12 (37.5) v 5
(15.6), p < 0.05; and for maximum work at peak exercise, 17 (53.1) v
8 (25), p < 0.02. Compared to placebo, there was net improvement
with trimetazidine in mean anginal attacks of 4.8/ week (95%
confidence interval (CI) 7.5 to 2.1; p < 0.002); in mean exercise
times at 1 mm ST segment depression of 94.2 seconds (95% CI 182.8 to
5.6; p < 0.05), and at onset of angina of 113.1 seconds (95% CI
181.6 to 44.6; p < 0.02); and in mean maximum work at peak exercise
of 1.4 metabolic equivalents (95% CI 2.4 to 0.3; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stable angina uncontrolled with diltiazem
had a clinically important improvement after combination treatment
with trimetazidine, without adverse haemodynamic events or increased
side effects.
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 9404250 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12. Michaelides AP, Spiropoulos K, Dimopoulos K, Athanasiades
D, Toutouzas P. Clin Drug Invest. 1997;13:8–14.
13. Kolbel F, Bada V. Heart. 2002;87(suppl 1):A9–A10. |