Number 20, 2003 Hibernation preconditioning Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of dysfunctional myocardial
tissue in ischemic heart disease
Back to the SummaryAnna S. John, Dudley J. Pennell
CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital and National Heart and Lung Institute,
London, UK
Correspondence: Dr Anna John, CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital
and
National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Tel: +44 7351 8800, fax: +44 7351 8816, e-mail: a.john@rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
| Abstract
Ischemia can produce reversible dysfunction of the myocardium.
If this is of short duration and is spontaneously reversible,
it is termed “stunning.” It is thought that repeat stunning
can lead to persistent dysfunction of viable myocardium,
known as “hibernation.” Hibernation is still reversible
if blood supply is restored.
In functional hibernation, there are no structural changes
within the cells and there is a response to inotropic stimulation
such as dobutamine. In structural hibernation, the cardiomyocytes
have lost contractile proteins but the cell membranes are
still intact, ie, the cells are still viable. Dobutamine
studies will be negative in structural hibernation, but
nuclear techniques are able to detect viable myocardium.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess wall motion as
well as viability. It is considered the gold standard for ventricular function
and mass measurement. Myocardial viability is tested using a late enhancement
technique, in which nonviable myocardium appears bright and viable myocardium
remains dark.
The combination of wall motion and viability assessment can differentiate between
normal, hibernating, and nonviable myocardium. Perfusion CMR can demonstrate
ischemia. Therefore, CMR can be used to assess the whole spectrum of ischemic
heart disease and provides useful information for planning treatment strategies.
- Heart Metab. 2003;20:19–22.
Keywords: Dysfunctional myocardium, imaging, cardiovascular
magnetic resonance |
Introduction
Dysfunctional myocardial tissue is characterized by wall
motion abnormality. If significant amounts of myocardium are dysfunctional
it may result in clinical heart failure. In the context of ischemic
heart disease, dysfunction can be due to acute or chronic ischemia,
or infarction. To optimize treatment it is of crucial importance
to differentiate between viable and nonviable myocardium.
Ischemia
Stunning
Myocardial stunning is defined as reversible contractile dysfunction
that occurs after a period of myocardial ischemia. It persists
for a period of time after myocardial perfusion has returned to
normal. Stunning has been associated with thrombolysis for acute
myocardial infarction, or coronary artery bypass surgery [1, 2].
Hibernation
Hibernating myocardium is defined as persistently dysfunctional
but viable resting myocardium. Rahimtoola [3] postulated that myocardial
function can be partially or completely restored if the myocardial
oxygen supply-demand relationship is favorably altered by improving
blood flow and/or reducing demand. The mechanisms responsible for
hibernation are not fully understood, but it has been shown that
prolonged coronary hypoperfusion due to hemodynamically relevant
coronary artery disease and repetitive stunning lead to hibernation [4,
5]. Two stages of hibernation have been postulated: functional
hibernation is characterized by myocardial dysfunction without
structural changes within the cardiomyocyte, while structurally
hibernating cardiomyocytes show loss of contractile proteins and
therefore may not respond to contractile stimuli such as dobutamine
despite being viable [6].
Infarction
Myocardial infarction results in irreversible contractile dysfunction
due to permanent loss of myocytes and scar formation. Acutely,
there is tissue edema and cell necrosis, whilst in chronic infarction
scar formation occurs with an increase in extracellular matrix.
Infarct size and transmural extent are important parameters to
predict outcome and functional recovery after revascularization
[7].
Magnetic resonance imaging of
dysfunctional myocardium
Functional assessment
The first step in imaging dysfunctional myocardium is to identify
the extent of dysfunction. This can be done using short-axis cines
sequences spanning the entire left ventricle as well as four-chamber
and two-chamber cines. Myocardial regions can be reproducibly labeled
using a 17-segment model as suggested by the Cardiac Imaging Committee
of the American Heart Association [8]. This divides the left ventricle
into six basal, six midventricular, and four apical segments, as
well as one segment covering the apical cap, which is assessed
in long-axis views such as four-chamber or two-chamber views. At
the same time, the short-axis cine stack can be used to calculate
left ventricular volumes and function [9]. Cine imaging of the
left ventricle allows accurate assessment not only of functional
parameters but also of ventricular geometry. This is of particular
relevance in the presence of unusual nonellipsoid ventricular shapes,
for example in left ventricular aneurysm formation. Ventricular
models commonly used in echocardiography do not account for deviations
from the usual ellipsoid shape of the left ventricle.
Cine imaging can also help to distinguish between viable and nonviable myocardium
by estimating the end-diastolic wall thickness as shown by Baer et al [10], who demonstrated that an end-diastolic wall thickness below 5.5 mm suggests
nonviable myocardium.
The use of low-dose dobutamine (up to 10 mg/kg per min) as an inotropic stimulus
can be used to predict functional recovery after revascularization; however,
viable myocardium which has lost contractile proteins due to longstanding ischemia,
ie, structurally hibernating myocardium, will not respond to inotropic stimulation.
Tissue characterization
The use of late gadolinium enhancement has become the state-of-the-art
method of differentiating viable from nonviable myocardium. As
shown by Kim et al [11], nonviable myocardium shows delayed enhancement
with gadolinium DTPA. Using an inversion recovery sequence with
an adjustable inversion time to suppress the signal of viable myocardium,
nonviable myocardium appears bright in contrast with viable myocardium,
which is black. Gadolinium DTPA is an extravascular contrast agent
which cannot penetrate the cell membrane of viable cardiomyocytes.
Therefore, viable but dysfunctional myocardium does not show late
enhancement with gadolinium DTPA.
Acute myocardial infarction is associated with tissue edema, ie, an increase
in the extracellular space. Gadolinium DTPA accumulates in the extracellular
space and persists after it has been washed out from the surrounding viable
myocardium. In some cases, in the centre of the bright infarcted area, a dark
core can be found which corresponds to an area of no-reflow. This phenomenon
can be explained by microvascular obstruction which occurs in acute myocardial
infarction (Figure 1) [12].
Figure
1. Late enhancement in acute myocardial infarction with dark core
corresponding to microvascular obstruction.
In chronic myocardial infarction, there is scar formation with
an increased extracellular matrix mainly consisting of collagenous
fibers. In this case,
gadolinium DTPA accumulates between the collagenous fibers in the extracellular
space and takes longer to clear from scar tissue than from viable myocardium
[13]. This mechanism is responsible for late enhancement in chronic myocardial
infarction (Figure 2).
Figure
2. Late enhancement in chronic myocardial infarction: LAD and RCA
territories.
This technique allows exact quantification of the transmural
extent of nonviable as well as viable tissue on a segment by
segment basis, which is an important
advantage over other nuclear techniques. The transmural extent of infarction
has been used as a predictor of recovery after revascularization: Kim et
al [7] demonstrated a direct correlation between the amount of late gadolinium
enhancement and the recovery of function after revascularization. Planimetry
of the hyperenhanced areas multiplied by the slice thickness and the specific
weight of myocardium allows quantification of nonviable tissue in grams.
Subtracted
from the entire left ventricular mass, the percentage of nonviable tissue
in relation to the left ventricular mass can be calculated.
Myocardial perfusion
Perfusion imaging can be used to further characterize dysfunctional
myocardium. It can determine the presence of a fixed defect as
it occurs in myocardial infarction, or of ischemia characterized
by a reversible perfusion defect. Resting perfusion imaging is
performed during injection of a bolus of gadolinium DTPA. For stress
perfusion imaging, hyperemia is generated by infusion of adenosine,
dipyridamole, or other vasodilating agents. Quantitative perfusion
measurement is possible by calculating signal intensity time curves
and deriving myocardial perfusion indices. The difference in resting
and hyperemic perfusion indices is called myocardial perfusion
reserve, which can demonstrate ischemia and detect the presence
of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (Figure
3) [14].
Figure 3. Myocardial perfusion images showing normal resting perfusion
(A) and a perfusion defect during stress (B). Summary
A combination of functional imaging using cine sequences,
tissue characterization using late gadolinium enhancement and inversion
recovery techniques, and perfusion imaging can adequately characterize
dysfunctional tissue. It can differentiate viable from nonviable
and ischemic from nonischemic myocardium. This is of paramount
importance in planning treatment strategies.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Dr James C.C. Moon and Dr Andrew G.F. Elkington for
contributing microvascular obstruction and perfusion images, respectively. Back to the Summary
REFERENCES
1. Sheehan FH, Doerr R, Schmidt WG, Bolson
EL, Uebis R, von Essen R, Effert S, Dodge HT.
Early recovery of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy for acute
myocardial infarction: an important determinant of survival.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Aug;12(2):289-300.
PMID: 3392324 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2. Kloner RA, Przyklenk K, Kay GL.
Clinical evidence for stunned myocardium after coronary artery bypass surgery.
J Card Surg. 1994 May;9(3 Suppl):397-402. Review.
PMID: 8069026 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3. Rahimtoola SH.
The hibernating myocardium.
Am Heart J. 1989 Jan;117(1):211-21.
PMID: 2783527 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4. Camici PG, Dutka DP.
Repetitive stunning, hibernation, and heart failure: contribution of PET to establishing
a link.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001 Mar;280(3):H929-36. Review. No abstract
available.
PMID: 11179032 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5. Canty JM Jr, Fallavollita JA.
Chronic hibernation and chronic stunning: a continuum.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2000 Sep-Oct;7(5):509-27. Review.
PMID: 11083201 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6. Vanoverschelde JL, Melin JA.
The pathophysiology of myocardial hibernation: current controversies and future
directions.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001 Mar-Apr;43(5):387-98. Review.
PMID: 11251126 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti
O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM.
The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible
myocardial dysfunction.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 16;343(20):1445-53.
PMID: 11078769 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK,
Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS; American Heart
Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac
Imaging.
Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging
of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging
Committee of the Council on Cliniical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002 Feb;18(1):539-42. No abstract available.
PMID: 12135124 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.
Bellenger NG, Grothues F, Smith GC, Pennell DJ.
Quantification of right and left ventricular function by cardiovascular magnetic
resonance.
Herz. 2000 Jun;25(4):392-9.
PMID: 10948775 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10. Baer FM, Voth E, Schneider CA, Theissen P, Schicha
H, Sechtem U.
Comparison of low-dose dobutamine-gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and
positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with chronic
coronary artery disease. A functional and morphological approach to the detection
of residual myocardial viability.
Circulation. 1995 Feb 15;91(4):1006-15.
PMID: 7850935 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL,
Simonetti O, Bundy J, Finn JP, Klocke FJ, Judd RM.
Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct
age, and contractile function.
Circulation. 1999 Nov 9;100(19):1992-2002.
PMID: 10556226 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12. Rochitte CE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, Reeder SB, McVeigh
ER, Furuta T, Becker LC, Melin JA.
Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after
acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1998 Sep 8;98(10):1006-14.
PMID: 9737521 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.
Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U.
Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Eur Heart J. 2002 Apr;23(8):602-19. Review. No abstract available.
PMID: 11969275 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg
B, Klein C, Klimek W, Oswald H, Fleck E.
Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on
cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Circulation. 2000 Mar 28;101(12):1379-83.
PMID: 10736280 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Back
to the Summary |