Home About Latest issue Back issues Images Dictionary of Cardiac Metabolism E-mail alert Contact

Number 20, 2003
Hibernation preconditioning

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of dysfunctional myocardial tissue in ischemic heart disease

Back Back to the Summary

Anna S. John, Dudley J. Pennell
CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital and National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
Correspondence: Dr Anna John, CMR Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital and
National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Tel: +44 7351 8800, fax: +44 7351 8816, e-mail: a.john@rbh.nthames.nhs.uk

Abstract

Ischemia can produce reversible dysfunction of the myocardium. If this is of short duration and is spontaneously reversible, it is termed “stunning.” It is thought that repeat stunning can lead to persistent dysfunction of viable myocardium, known as “hibernation.” Hibernation is still reversible if blood supply is restored.
   In functional hibernation, there are no structural changes within the cells and there is a response to inotropic stimulation such as dobutamine. In structural hibernation, the cardiomyocytes have lost contractile proteins but the cell membranes are still intact, ie, the cells are still viable. Dobutamine studies will be negative in structural hibernation, but nuclear techniques are able to detect viable myocardium.
  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess wall motion as well as viability. It is considered the gold standard for ventricular function and mass measurement. Myocardial viability is tested using a late enhancement technique, in which nonviable myocardium appears bright and viable myocardium remains dark.
   The combination of wall motion and viability assessment can differentiate between normal, hibernating, and nonviable myocardium. Perfusion CMR can demonstrate ischemia. Therefore, CMR can be used to assess the whole spectrum of ischemic heart disease and provides useful information for planning treatment strategies. - Heart Metab. 2003;20:19–22.

Keywords: Dysfunctional myocardium, imaging, cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Introduction
Dysfunctional myocardial tissue is characterized by wall motion abnormality. If significant amounts of myocardium are dysfunctional it may result in clinical heart failure. In the context of ischemic heart disease, dysfunction can be due to acute or chronic ischemia, or infarction. To optimize treatment it is of crucial importance to differentiate between viable and nonviable myocardium.

Ischemia

Stunning
Myocardial stunning is defined as reversible contractile dysfunction that occurs after a period of myocardial ischemia. It persists for a period of time after myocardial perfusion has returned to normal. Stunning has been associated with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction, or coronary artery bypass surgery [1, 2].

Hibernation
Hibernating myocardium is defined as persistently dysfunctional but viable resting myocardium. Rahimtoola [3] postulated that myocardial function can be partially or completely restored if the myocardial oxygen supply-demand relationship is favorably altered by improving blood flow and/or reducing demand. The mechanisms responsible for hibernation are not fully understood, but it has been shown that prolonged coronary hypoperfusion due to hemodynamically relevant coronary artery disease and repetitive stunning lead to hibernation [4, 5]. Two stages of hibernation have been postulated: functional hibernation is characterized by myocardial dysfunction without structural changes within the cardiomyocyte, while structurally hibernating cardiomyocytes show loss of contractile proteins and therefore may not respond to contractile stimuli such as dobutamine despite being viable [6].

Infarction
Myocardial infarction results in irreversible contractile dysfunction due to permanent loss of myocytes and scar formation. Acutely, there is tissue edema and cell necrosis, whilst in chronic infarction scar formation occurs with an increase in extracellular matrix. Infarct size and transmural extent are important parameters to predict outcome and functional recovery after revascularization [7].

Magnetic resonance imaging of dysfunctional myocardium

Functional assessment
The first step in imaging dysfunctional myocardium is to identify the extent of dysfunction. This can be done using short-axis cines sequences spanning the entire left ventricle as well as four-chamber and two-chamber cines. Myocardial regions can be reproducibly labeled using a 17-segment model as suggested by the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association [8]. This divides the left ventricle into six basal, six midventricular, and four apical segments, as well as one segment covering the apical cap, which is assessed in long-axis views such as four-chamber or two-chamber views. At the same time, the short-axis cine stack can be used to calculate left ventricular volumes and function [9]. Cine imaging of the left ventricle allows accurate assessment not only of functional parameters but also of ventricular geometry. This is of particular relevance in the presence of unusual nonellipsoid ventricular shapes, for example in left ventricular aneurysm formation. Ventricular models commonly used in echocardiography do not account for deviations from the usual ellipsoid shape of the left ventricle.
Cine imaging can also help to distinguish between viable and nonviable myocardium by estimating the end-diastolic wall thickness as shown by Baer et al [10], who demonstrated that an end-diastolic wall thickness below 5.5 mm suggests nonviable myocardium.
The use of low-dose dobutamine (up to 10 mg/kg per min) as an inotropic stimulus can be used to predict functional recovery after revascularization; however, viable myocardium which has lost contractile proteins due to longstanding ischemia, ie, structurally hibernating myocardium, will not respond to inotropic stimulation.

Tissue characterization
The use of late gadolinium enhancement has become the state-of-the-art method of differentiating viable from nonviable myocardium. As shown by Kim et al [11], nonviable myocardium shows delayed enhancement with gadolinium DTPA. Using an inversion recovery sequence with an adjustable inversion time to suppress the signal of viable myocardium, nonviable myocardium appears bright in contrast with viable myocardium, which is black. Gadolinium DTPA is an extravascular contrast agent which cannot penetrate the cell membrane of viable cardiomyocytes. Therefore, viable but dysfunctional myocardium does not show late enhancement with gadolinium DTPA.
Acute myocardial infarction is associated with tissue edema, ie, an increase in the extracellular space. Gadolinium DTPA accumulates in the extracellular space and persists after it has been washed out from the surrounding viable myocardium. In some cases, in the centre of the bright infarcted area, a dark core can be found which corresponds to an area of no-reflow. This phenomenon can be explained by microvascular obstruction which occurs in acute myocardial infarction (Figure 1) [12].

Figure 1. Late enhancement in acute myocardial infarction with dark core corresponding to microvascular obstruction.

In chronic myocardial infarction, there is scar formation with an increased extracellular matrix mainly consisting of collagenous fibers. In this case, gadolinium DTPA accumulates between the collagenous fibers in the extracellular space and takes longer to clear from scar tissue than from viable myocardium [13]. This mechanism is responsible for late enhancement in chronic myocardial infarction (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Late enhancement in chronic myocardial infarction: LAD and RCA territories.

This technique allows exact quantification of the transmural extent of nonviable as well as viable tissue on a segment by segment basis, which is an important advantage over other nuclear techniques. The transmural extent of infarction has been used as a predictor of recovery after revascularization: Kim et al [7] demonstrated a direct correlation between the amount of late gadolinium enhancement and the recovery of function after revascularization. Planimetry of the hyperenhanced areas multiplied by the slice thickness and the specific weight of myocardium allows quantification of nonviable tissue in grams. Subtracted from the entire left ventricular mass, the percentage of nonviable tissue in relation to the left ventricular mass can be calculated.

Myocardial perfusion
Perfusion imaging can be used to further characterize dysfunctional myocardium. It can determine the presence of a fixed defect as it occurs in myocardial infarction, or of ischemia characterized by a reversible perfusion defect. Resting perfusion imaging is performed during injection of a bolus of gadolinium DTPA. For stress perfusion imaging, hyperemia is generated by infusion of adenosine, dipyridamole, or other vasodilating agents. Quantitative perfusion measurement is possible by calculating signal intensity time curves and deriving myocardial perfusion indices. The difference in resting and hyperemic perfusion indices is called myocardial perfusion reserve, which can demonstrate ischemia and detect the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (Figure 3) [14].

Figure 3. Myocardial perfusion images showing normal resting perfusion (A) and a perfusion defect during stress (B).

Summary
A combination of functional imaging using cine sequences, tissue characterization using late gadolinium enhancement and inversion recovery techniques, and perfusion imaging can adequately characterize dysfunctional tissue. It can differentiate viable from nonviable and ischemic from nonischemic myocardium. This is of paramount importance in planning treatment strategies.

Acknowledgments
Thanks to Dr James C.C. Moon and Dr Andrew G.F. Elkington for contributing microvascular obstruction and perfusion images, respectively.

Back Back to the Summary

REFERENCES

1. Sheehan FH, Doerr R, Schmidt WG, Bolson EL, Uebis R, von Essen R, Effert S, Dodge HT.
Early recovery of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: an important determinant of survival.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Aug;12(2):289-300.
PMID: 3392324 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


2. Kloner RA, Przyklenk K, Kay GL.
Clinical evidence for stunned myocardium after coronary artery bypass surgery.
J Card Surg. 1994 May;9(3 Suppl):397-402. Review.
PMID: 8069026 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

3. Rahimtoola SH.
The hibernating myocardium.
Am Heart J. 1989 Jan;117(1):211-21.
PMID: 2783527 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

4. Camici PG, Dutka DP.
Repetitive stunning, hibernation, and heart failure: contribution of PET to establishing a link.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001 Mar;280(3):H929-36. Review. No abstract available.
PMID: 11179032 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

5. Canty JM Jr, Fallavollita JA.
Chronic hibernation and chronic stunning: a continuum.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2000 Sep-Oct;7(5):509-27. Review.
PMID: 11083201 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

6. Vanoverschelde JL, Melin JA.
The pathophysiology of myocardial hibernation: current controversies and future directions.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001 Mar-Apr;43(5):387-98. Review.
PMID: 11251126 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

7. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM.
The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 16;343(20):1445-53.
PMID: 11078769 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

8. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging.
Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Cliniical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002 Feb;18(1):539-42. No abstract available.
PMID: 12135124 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

9. Bellenger NG, Grothues F, Smith GC, Pennell DJ.
Quantification of right and left ventricular function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Herz. 2000 Jun;25(4):392-9.
PMID: 10948775 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

10. Baer FM, Voth E, Schneider CA, Theissen P, Schicha H, Sechtem U.
Comparison of low-dose dobutamine-gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. A functional and morphological approach to the detection of residual myocardial viability.
Circulation. 1995 Feb 15;91(4):1006-15.
PMID: 7850935 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

11. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Finn JP, Klocke FJ, Judd RM.
Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.
Circulation. 1999 Nov 9;100(19):1992-2002.
PMID: 10556226 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

12. Rochitte CE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, Reeder SB, McVeigh ER, Furuta T, Becker LC, Melin JA.
Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1998 Sep 8;98(10):1006-14.
PMID: 9737521 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


13. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U.
Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Eur Heart J. 2002 Apr;23(8):602-19. Review. No abstract available.
PMID: 11969275 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

14. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B, Klein C, Klimek W, Oswald H, Fleck E.
Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Circulation. 2000 Mar 28;101(12):1379-83.
PMID: 10736280 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Back Back to the Summary

Although great care has been taken in compiling the information given in this website,
the publisher or the sponsor is not responsible for the continued currency of the information,
for any errors or omissions, or for any consequence arising therefrom.
© 2010 Les Laboratoires Servier