Number 25, 2004
Heart failure in diabetes

Metabolic imaging and diabetes

Back Back to the Summary

Juhani Knuuti
Turku PET Centre, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
Correspondence: Juhani Knuuti, Turku PET Centre, Turku University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 52 FI-20521, Turku, Finland.
Tel: +35823132842, fax: +35822318191, e-mail: juhani.knuuti@utu.fi

Abstract

Metabolic imaging studies have been able to increase our knowledge about the physiology and pathophysiology of cardiac disease in diabetes. Noninvasive quantification of myocardial perfusion, oxygen consumption, glucose utilization, and fatty acid metabolism are possible using positron emission tomography. These studies have shown that, with normal insulin, glucose, and free fatty acid concentrations, there does not seem to be a major defect in substrate metabolism in the diabetic heart. However, very limited data are available concerning myocardial substrate metabolism under different metabolic conditions, such as ischemia, hyperlipidemia, or hyperglycemia. These conditions, although fluctuating over time, commonly accompany diabetes. Further studies are needed to clarify these issues. ▪ Heart Metab. 2004;25:14–17.

Keywords: Diabetes, heart, metabolism, positron emission tomography

Introduction
It has long been known that patients with diabetes have myocardial dysfunction and heart failure not necessarily attributable to any known cardiac disease [1]. Abnormal intracellular calcium metabolism and coronary regulation, autonomic neuropathy, and defective glucose and fatty acid metabolism have been proposed to contribute to the pathogenic mechanism [2,3].
Diabetes is a major risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease and individuals with diabetes have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of developing coronary artery disease [4]. Metabolic alterations may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Glucose is an important substrate for the myocardial cells, especially during ischemia, and preserved myocardial glucose uptake appears to be crucial to the viability of the jeopardized myocardium. This is supported also by the finding that, in high-risk patients, intense insulin therapy improves prognosis in those with type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes with acute myocardial infarction [5].
Metabolic imaging studies have been able to increase our knowledge of the physiology and pathophysiology of cardiac disease in diabetes. Until now, most studies have focused on the characterization of metabolic abnormalities in the diabetic heart.

Myocardial substrate metabolism
Free fatty acids (FFAs), glucose, and lactate are the main fuels of the heart [6]. Under normal resting conditions, metabolism is mainly oxidative, with FFA being the major source, whereas glycolysis contributes only about 30% of substrate to the tricarboxylic acid cycle.
Ischemia is associated with increased glycolysis, with glucose transporters translocated to the cell membrane. During states of mild ischemia, lactate continues to be removed from the myocardium by the residual blood flow, but accumulates in tissue when blood flow decreases further during more severe states of ischemia. Increased tissue concentrations of lactate and hydrogen ions impair glycolysis, leading to loss of transmembrane ion concentration gradients, disruption of cell membranes and, ultimately, to cell death [6].
As diabetes has significant effects on the concentrations of circulating substrate, it can be assumed that cardiac substrate metabolism is directly altered in diabetes (Table I). In addition to potential changes in glucose and FFA metabolism, there are changes in concentrations of lactate and ketone bodies, leading to their increased uptake in uncontrolled diabetes [6].

Table 1. Is diabetes associated with changes in myocardial substrate metabolism? Summary of myocardial energy metabolism in diabetes during different physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

Application of metabolic imaging
Noninvasive quantification of perfusion, oxygen consumption, glucose utilization, and fatty acid metabolism are possible using positron emission tomography (PET). The most commonly applied metabolic imaging has been measurement of glucose uptake using fluorine-18 ([18F])-labeled deoxyglucose [7]. Recently, the use of carbon-11 ([11C])-labeled glucose has been reintroduced and has been shown to provide accurate quantification of glucose uptake [8].
Two PET tracers have been used to measure free fatty acid metabolism: [11C]palmitic acid has been traditionally used, allowing both FFA uptake and oxidative metabolism to be quantified [6,7], and [18F]-6-thia-heptadecanoic acid has also been used recently to study fatty acid metabolism in humans [9]. The tracers [11C]acetate and [15O]oxygen have been used to measure myocardial oxygen consumption with PET in humans [10]. Lactate also has been labeled with [11C], and human studies have been successfully performed.
Myocardial scintigraphy using γ-emitting tracers has also been applied to the investigation of myocardial FFA metabolism. The limitation of this technique is that it does not allow absolute quantification of metabolic processes.

Cardiac metabolic imaging in diabetes
Most cardiac metabolic studies in diabetes have focused on the characterization of metabolic abnormalities in the diabetic heart [1119]. It is well known that resistance to the action of insulin in peripheral tissues characterizes diabetic patients and, thus, an apparent question is whether similar insulin resistance exists in the diabetic heart.
In patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes, two studies have reported preserved myocardial glucose uptake despite peripheral insulin resistance and reduced glucose uptake in skeletal muscle [11,12]. These studies were performed during euglycemia and controlled infusion of insulin.
In patients with type 2 diabetes, the results are more controversial. In some studies reduced myocardial glucose uptake was observed [1315], whereas in others no such difference was found [1619]. As several factors affect myocardial substrate metabolism, the metabolic imaging should be performed under standardized metabolic conditions. Most of those studies that were performed during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps with comparable insulin, glucose and FFA concentrations revealed myocardial glucose uptakes that were similar in those with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic individuals. In the study by Utriainen et al [17], concentrations of insulin were used that were 5-fold greater than in the physiological range, but in the other studies insulin concentrations were within the physiological range. In patients with type 2 diabetes, other diseases such as coronary heart disease, renal disease, and obesity are common and may also confound the findings.
Serum FFA concentrations are usually increased in patients with type 2 diabetes, as a result of enhanced rates of lipolysis, impaired suppression of lipolysis by insulin, and defective clearance of FFA [20]. An attractive hypothesis has been that increased availability and oxidation of FFAs leads to impaired insulin-mediated glucose uptake and causes insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. In one previous study, myocardial fatty acid uptake and indices of β-oxidation (measured with scintigraphy and iodine-123-labeled heptadecanoic acid) were reduced in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance.
A recent study applying a PET technique demonstrated that FFA uptake in the femoral muscle was decreased by about 25% in a glucose-intolerant group, whereas no differences were observed with respect to myocardial uptake of FFA [21] (Figure 1). Thus, in individuals with disturbed glucose tolerance, heart and skeletal muscle may differ with respect to substrate utilization. The findings of this study also argued against the hypothesis that excessive FFA utilization per se is the key explanation for impaired glucose utilization. This idea was also supported by another PET study using [11C]palmitate, which demonstrated that, in the presence of comparable FFA concentrations, myocardial FFA uptake and oxidation are similar in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals [22].


Figure 1. Positron emission tomography images of free fatty acid (FFA) uptake, using [18F]-labeled 6-thia-heptadecanoic acid, in the heart and femoral regions in a patient with type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)/impaired glucose uptake (IGT) and a nondiabetic individual, in the fasting state with similar circulating FFA concentrations. Cardiac FFA uptake is comparable in the two individuals, but skeletal muscle uptake is decreased in the patient with diabetes.



As to the effects of treatment of diabetes on myocardial substrate metabolism, very limited data are available. Oral treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes have historically been based on sulphonylureas and metformin. Recently, the availability of glinidines and glitazones has increased the armamentarium of antidiabetic regimens. All these regimens have different mechanisms of action, but their efficacies are similar [23]. Glitazones have been shown to increase concentrations of the glucose transporter (GLUT 1 and GLUT 4) and to normalize myocardial glucose uptake in rat heart. In a recent PET study in humans, rosiglitazone increased insulin-stimulated myocardial uptake of glucose by 38%, whereas metformin had no significant effect [23]. FFA concentrations were suppressed to a greater extent by rosiglitazone, and the enhanced myocardial uptake of glucose is probably attributable to this phenomenon. In any event, this effect of rosiglitazone may counteract the metabolic alterations in the diabetic heart.
Despite the limitations in the studies mentioned above, one may surmise that, with normal circulating insulin, glucose, and FFA concentrations, there seems to be no demonstrable major defect in myocardial substrate metabolism in the hearts of patients with diabetes. However, there are no data concerning myocardial glucose uptake during the perturbed conditions accompanying diabetes, and in particular during ischemia or exercise. Thus these studies do not exclude the possibility that, under conditions in which circulating FFA concentrations are increased, FFA utilization could be enhanced and glucose metabolism inhibited. Limited information is also available as to myocardial substrate metabolism during hyperlipidemia or hyperglycemia, conditions that commonly accompany the diabetic patient during their daily life. ▪



Back Back to the Summary

REFERENCES

1. Kannel WB, McGee DL.
Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study.
JAMA. 1979;241:2035–2038.
PMID: 430798 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


2. Fein FS, Sonnenblick EH.
Diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994;8:65–73.
PMID: 8086330 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


3. Rodrigues B, Cam MC, McNeill JH.
Myocardial substrate metabolism: implications for diabetic cardiomyopathy.
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27:169–179.
PMID: 7760340 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


4. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M.
Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229–234.
PMID: 9673301 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


5. Malmberg K.
Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. DIGAMI (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Study Group.
BMJ. 1997;314:1512–1515.
PMID: 9169397 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


6. Opie LH.
Fuels: aerobic and anaerobic metabolism. In: Opie LH, ed. The Heart. Physiology, from Cell to Circulation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers;1998.

7. Schelbert H, Schwaiger M.
PET studies of the heart. In: Phelps M, Marizziotta J, Schelbert H, eds. Positron Emission Tomography and Autoradiography: Principles and Applications for the Brain and Heart. New York: Raven Press;1986.

8. Herrero P, Sharp TL, Dence C, Haraden BM, Gropler RJ.
Comparison of 1-C-glucose and F-FDG for quantifying myocardial glucose use with PET.
J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1530–1541.
PMID: 12411556 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


9. DeGrado TR, Coenen HH, Stöcklin G.
14(R,S)-[18F]Fluoro-6-thia-heptadecanoic acid (FTHA): evaluation in mouse of a new probe of myocardial utilization of long chain fatty acids.
J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1888–1896.
PMID: 1919727 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


10. Lida H, Rhodes CG, Araujo LI, et al.
Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial metabolic rate for oxygen by use of 15O2 inhalation and positron emission tomography. Theory, error analysis, and application in humans.
Circulation. 1996;94:792–807.
PMID: 8772704 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


11. vom Dahl J, Herman WH, Hicks RJ, et al.
Myocardial glucose uptake in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus assessed quantitatively by dynamic positron emission tomography.
Circulation. 1993;88:395–404.
PMID: 8339403 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


12. Nuutila P, Knuuti J, Ruotsalainen U, et al.
Insulin resistance is localized to skeletal but not heart muscle in type I diabetes.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1993;264:E756–E762.

13. Ohtake T, Yokoyama I, Watanabe T, et al.
Myocardial glucose metabolism in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients evaluated by FDG-PET.
J Nucl Med. 1995;36:456–463.
PMID: 7884509 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


14. Voipio-Pulkki LM, Nuutila P, Knuuti MJ, et al.
Heart and skeletal muscle glucose disposal in type 2 diabetic patients as determined by positron emission tomography.
J Nucl Med. 1993;34:2064–2067.
PMID: 8254388 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


15. Iozzo P, Chareonthaitawee P, Dutka D, Betteridge DJ, Ferrannini E, Camici PG.
Independent association of type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease with myocardial insulin resistance.
Diabetes 2002;51:3020–3024.

16. Mäki M, Nuutila P, Laine H, et al.
Myocardial glucose uptake in patients with NIDDM and stable coronary artery disease.
Diabetes. 1997;46:1491–1496.
PMID: 9287051 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


17. Utriainen T, Takala T, Luotolahti M, et al.
Insulin resistance characterizes glucose uptake in skeletal muscle but not in the heart in NIDDM.
Diabetologia. 1998;41:555–559.
PMID: 9628273 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


18. Yokoyama I, Yonekura K, Ohtake T, et al.
Role of insulin resistance in heart and skeletal muscle F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2000;7:242–248.
PMID: 10888395 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


19. Jagasia D, Whiting JM, Concato J, Pfau S, McNulty PH.
Effect of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus on myocardial insulin responsiveness in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Circulation. 2001;103:1734–1739.
PMID: 11282903 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


20. Taskinen MR, Bogardus C, Kennedy A, Howard BV.
Multiple disturbances of free fatty acid metabolism in noninsulin-dependent diabetes.
J Clin Invest. 1985;76:637–644.
PMID: 3897287 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


21. Turpeinen AK, Takala TO, Nuutila P, et al.
Impaired fatty acid uptake in skeletal muscle but not in myocardium in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Studies with PET and 14(R,S)-[18-F]fluoro-6-thia-heptadecanoid acid.
Diabetes. 1999;48:1245–125.
PMID: 10342811 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


22. Knuuti J, Turpeinen AK, Takala TO, et al.
Myocardial fatty acid oxidation in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
Diabetologia. 2001;44:184–187.
PMID: 11270674 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


23. Hällsten K, Virtanen KA, Lönnqvist F, et al.
Enhancement of insulin-stimulated myocardial glucose uptake in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with rosiglitazone, a PPAR-gamma agonist.
Diabet Med. 2004. In press.

Back Back to the Summary

Although great care has been taken in compiling the information given in this website,
the publisher or the sponsor is not responsible for the continued currency of the information,
for any errors or omissions, or for any consequence arising therefrom.
© 2010 Les Laboratoires Servier