![]() |
|||||
Case report
![]() Coronary arteriography revealed an occluded right coronary artery that filled retrogradely, a normal left main stem, severe diffuse disease in the left anterior descending artery, and a proximally occluded circumflex artery (Figure 2). Left ventricular injection suggested moderate ventricular function. A subsequent transthoracic echocardiogram revealed hypokinesia of the lateral, mid, and inferior apical left ventricular walls, with an estimated ejection fraction of 50–55%. The patient's case was discussed in a joint Cardiology–Cardiac surgery meeting and he was felt to be a candidate for surgery if evidence of viable myocardium could be demonstrated. A dobutamine stress echocardiogram was requested.
![]() On stress echocardiography, all myocardial segments demonstrated increased contractility in response to low-dose dobutamine, suggestive of viability (Figure 3), with 2–3 mm anterolateral ST-segment depression in leads V3–V6 on the electrocardiogram.
![]() The patient underwent on-pump double coronary artery bypass surgery with a left internal mammary artery anastomosed to the distal left anterior descending artery and a saphenous vein graft to the first Obtuse Marginal (OM1) branch of the circumflex artery. His postoperative recovery was relatively uneventful, but he developed a superficial sternal infection, which responded to flucloxacillin. At 6-week follow-up, he was symptomatically much better, with an improved exercise tolerance (CCS grade I, NYHA grade II).
Discussion
Table I. Characteristics of myocardial hibernation and methods of detection.
Several tests can assist in the evaluation of myocardial viability and contractile reserve and the identification of patients in whom there is the potential for recovery of left ventricular dysfunction with revascularization. These tests include myocardial perfusion imaging by thallium scanning or positron emission tomography (PET) – an increase in inotropy using pharmacological or nonpharmacologic stimulation during left ventriculography, echocardiography, or PET. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can also detect hibernating myocardium. Detecting viable myocardium, whether hibernating or stunned, is of paramount clinical importance. The best method to assess viability, and the gold standard to which the techniques should be held, remain unclear. In the patient described here, dobutamine stress echocardiography was utilized. This method of noninvasive assessment of detecting hibernating myocardium has emerged as an important, readily available technique familiar to most cardiac surgeons [7]. Stress echocardiography examines the “inotropic reserve” of dysfunctional but viable myocardium through stimulation by inotropic agents – most commonly dobutamine, but also dopamine [8]. Viable myocardium shows improved global (ejection fraction) or regional contractile function (inotropic reserve), as assessed by simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography, in response to these agents [9]. It has been demonstrated in patients with myocardial viability on dobutamine stress echocardiography that a better outcome occurred with surgical revascularization than with medical treatment [10]. Similarly, the results of stress echocardiography can predict long-term outcome on the basis of the degree of myocardial viability (as measured by the number of segments, out of 12) before and after CABG [11]. However, despite a high predictive value, this method does appear to underestimate the extent of viable myocardium compared with results from thallium perfusion scanning [12]. The potential for recovery is assumed to be great enough to recommend revascularization when the total of hibernating and ischemic, but still functioning, myocardium is more than 60% of the left ventricle. In contrast, when more than 40% of the left ventricle is considered to be scarred or is metabolically inactive, surgical mortality is much greater, and the likelihood of the recovery of left ventricular dysfunction from CABG is much less. Accordingly, this generally means that the anterior wall territory as supplied by the left anterior descending artery must be viable [5,13,14]. In addition to myocardial viability, the degree of left ventricular enlargement is another important factor for the surgeon to take into account before considering the patient for revascularization. Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between left ventricular end-systolic volume as assessed by echocardiography and improvement in left ventricular dysfunction after CABG. When the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension is greater than 7 cm, operative mortality is likely to be high [15,16].
Conclusion
![]() REFERENCES 1. Bax JJ, Poldermans D, van der Wall EE.Evaluation of hibernating myocardium. Heart. 2004;90:1239–1240. PMID: 15486110 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 2. Braunwald E, Kloner RA. The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1982;66:1146–1149. PMID: 6754130 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 3. Rahimtoola SH. The hibernating myocardium. Am Heart J. 1989;117:211–221. PMID: 2783527 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 4. Hernandez-Pampaloni M, Bax JJ, Morita K, Dutka DP, Camici PG. Incidence of stunned, hibernating and scarred myocardium in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:314–321. PMID: 15791441 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 5. Cabin HS, Clubb KS, Vita N, Zaret BL. Regional dysfunction by equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography: a clinicopathologic study evaluating the relation of degree of dysfunction to the presence and extent of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:743–747. PMID: 3655142 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 6. Luss H, Schafers M, Neumann J, et al. Biochemical mechanisms of hibernation and stunning in the human heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;56:411–421. PMID: 12445882 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 7. Cheirif J. Diagnosis of myocardial stunning: a new use for myocardial contrast and dobutamine echocardiography. Am J Card Imaging. 1995;9:261–268. PMID: 8680143 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 8. Yao SS, Chaudhry FA. Assessment of myocardial viability with dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Echocardiography. 2005;22:71–83. PMID: 15660693 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 9. Rocchi G, Poldermans D, Bax JJ, et al. Usefulness of the ejection fraction response to dobutamine infusion in predicting functional recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:1440–1444. PMID: 10856389 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 10. Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1151–1158. PMID: 11923039 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 11. Cheirif J, Murgo JP. Assessment of myocardial viability by dobutamine echocardiography. Coron Artery Dis. 1995;6:600–605. PMID: 8574453 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 12. Sawada SG, Lewis SJ, Foltz J, et al. Usefulness of rest and low-dose dobutamine wall motion scores in predicting survival and benefit from revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:811–816. PMID: 11909564 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 13. Hausmann H, Meyer R, Siniawski H, et al. Factors excercising an influence on recovery of hibernating myocardium after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:89–95. PMID: 15200985 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 14. Westaby S. Coronary revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Surg Clin North Am. 2004;84:179–199. PMID: 15053189 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 15. Rizzello V, Poldermans D, Biagini E, et al. Comparison of long-term effect of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with viable versus nonviable left ventricular myocardium. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:757–760. PMID: 15374780 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 16. Rizzello V, Poldermans D, Biagini E, et al. Improvement of stress LVEF rather than rest LVEF after coronary revascularisation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium. Heart. 2005;91:319–323. PMID: 15710710 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 17. Bax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, et al. Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure symptoms and prognosis after revascularization in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and viable myocardium detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:163–169. PMID: 10400006 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 18. Marwick TH, Zuchowski C, Lauer MS, Secknus MA, Williams J, Lytle BW. Functional status and quality of life in patients with heart failure undergoing coronary bypass surgery after assessment of myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:750–758. PMID: 10080477 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 19. Meluzin J, Cerny J, Frelich M, et al. Prognostic value of the amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium in revascularized patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Investigators of this Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:912–920. PMID: 9768711 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 20. Meluzin J, Cerny J, Spinarova L, et al. Prognosis of patients with chronic coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction. The importance of myocardial viability. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003;5:85–93. 21. Schinkel AF, Poldermans D, Rizzello V, et al. Why do patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a substantial amount of viable myocardium not always recover in function after revascularization? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:385–390. PMID: 14762345 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 22. Bax JJ, Schinkel AF, Boersma E, et al. Extensive left ventricular remodeling does not allow viable myocardium to improve in left ventricular ejection fraction after revascularization and is associated with worse long-term prognosis. Circulation. 2004;110:II18–II22. 23. Marwick TH. The viable myocardium: epidemiology, detection, and clinical implications. Lancet. 1998;351:815–819. PMID: 9519973 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] |
|||||
|
Although great care has been taken in compiling
the information given in this website,
the publisher or the sponsor is not responsible for the continued currency of the information, for any errors or omissions, or for any consequence arising therefrom. © 2010 Les Laboratoires Servier |
|||||